Kingston Council is set to review its Vehicle Crossover Policy following a motion proposed at the council meeting on 14 October 2025. The review aims to address concerns that the current policy isn't adequately balancing highway safety with the practical needs of residents.

The motion, put forward by Councillor Yvonne Tracey, Opposition Spokesperson for Social Care (including Education), Public Health and Equalities, and seconded by Councillor James Giles, Leader of the Opposition; Opposition Spokesperson for Housing, Sustainable Transport, Waste and Recycling, Climate Action, Biodiversity and Planning Policy, seeks to address concerns regarding the current policy's restrictions on grass verge depth and the lack of an appeals process. Councillor Tracey's motion notes that the current policy requires applicants to demonstrate a minimum space of 3x4.6m, leading to application refusals despite adequate space for safe off-street parking. It also states that many applications are refused for grass verges deemed too deep beyond 2.0m, even when safe crossovers could be installed, creating disparities, especially in Berrylands where deep grass verges are common. This suggests the policy is not balancing safety and resident needs due to rigid application of these criteria.

The current policy requires applicants to demonstrate a minimum space of 3x4.6m for a crossover, and many applications are being refused where grass verges are deemed too deep beyond 2.0m. Councillor Tracey's motion notes that prior to 2019, rejected crossover applications could be referred to the relevant Neighbourhood Committee for determination by elected Members.

The motion states that crossover policy should balance highway safety with the practical needs of residents, and that rigidly applying a 2-metre depth maximum on grass verges or disallowing applications on the grounds of short driveways does not always achieve this balance.

The council has resolved to:

  • Review and amend the policy on grass verges so that deep verges do not automatically prevent residents from being granted a crossover, where it is otherwise safe and practical to do so, especially where many dropped curbs already exist on a street with deep grass verges.
  • Reinstate within the policy an appeals process, especially where the 3x4.6m requirement is the barrier, whereby rejected crossover applications can be referred to the relevant Neighbourhood Committee for final determination by elected councillors.

The Place Committee will use the criteria of safety and practicality when reviewing and amending the policy regarding grass verges. The reinstated appeals process to the Neighbourhood Committee will allow rejected crossover applications to be referred for final determination by elected councillors, especially where the 3x4.6m requirement is the barrier. This suggests that the amended policy may address issues related to the 3x4.6m space requirement.

The motion was referred to the Place Committee for further consideration. The full Public Reports Pack for the meeting is available online.