Kingston Council is set to review its Responsible Investment Policy following a motion put forward at the council meeting on 14 October 2025. The review aims to strengthen the existing policy by incorporating international best practices and implementing clear exclusion criteria.
The motion, proposed by Councillor Jamal Chohan, Deputy Leader of the Opposition; Opposition Spokesperson for Leisure and Economic Development, and seconded by Councillor James Giles, Leader of the Opposition; Opposition Spokesperson for Housing, Sustainable Transport, Waste and Recycling, Climate Action, Biodiversity and Planning Policy, calls for a strengthening of the current policy. The council agenda outlines the details of the motion.
The motion notes the Pension Fund Panel's decision on 17 September 2025, to review the Responsible Investment Policy, with consideration of international best practices, such as the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund model. It also highlights the precedent set by other pension funds, including the Danish Teachers' Pension Fund, which have divested from companies complicit in violations of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The motion further points to other UK Local Government Pension Scheme pools, like the Brunel Pension Partnership, which have adopted responsible investment policies with specific commitments on human rights.
The council is being asked to agree that a strengthened Responsible Investment Policy, featuring clear and robust exclusion criteria, is the most effective way to provide a clear mandate to the London CIV (Collaboration Investment Vehicle), an investment pool for London local authorities' pension funds, and fulfil the democratic will of the Full Council.
The motion proposes that the council:
- Mandate that the final, strengthened Responsible Investment Policy, incorporating the principles of international best practice, be presented to the Full Council for formal approval no later than the December 2025 meeting. This timeline ensures a swift review and implementation process.
- Instruct the Pension Fund Panel to immediately conduct a review to differentiate between its pooled fund holdings and any segregated or directly held investments.
- Ask the Panel, where any directly held or segregated investments are found to be in companies on internationally recognised exclusion lists (such as those published by the UN Human Rights Office), to consider whether the process of divestment from those investments should begin immediately, in line with a prudent, 'no-loss' sales policy. This suggests that the financial implications are being considered and that divestment should not result in a loss.
The public reports pack provides further details on the motion and other items discussed at the meeting.