Sutton Council has formally backed electoral reform, advocating for a move away from the First Past the Post (FPTP) system towards proportional representation (PR).
The decision was made during a council meeting on Monday, July 13, 2026, where councillors debated and voted on a key motion.
Councillor Lisa Webster, who proposed the motion, argued that FPTP leads to disproportional outcomes and a postcode lottery
for votes. She cited the 2024 General Election, where the winning party secured a massive 63% majority of seats on just 33% of the vote.
Similarly, in the 2026 Sutton Local Elections, we won 44% of the vote, which first past the post translated into nearly 93% of the seats. Meanwhile, Reform UK, the Conservatives and the Greens won a combined 48% of the vote, supported by nearly half our residents. And yet, they hold just two seats between them, with the Conservatives and Greens completely unrepresented.
Every single vote should count equally,
Councillor Webster stated. This isn't an abstract academic debate. The way we vote is fundamental to the real-life issues our residents face.
Councillor Ian Simpson seconded the motion, highlighting his work with the Electoral Reform Society and the potential for a pro-PR Prime Minister to enact change. He noted that in the recent local elections, parties secured large majorities of seats with less than two-fifths of the vote. Councillor Simpson also pointed to the single transferable vote system
as a model, which is already used in Scotland and Northern Ireland. This system, he explained, uses multi-member wards
and is very simple for voters to use.
He added that it allows independent candidates
to do well
and ensures the composition of councillors in our town halls broadly reflects how local people have expressed their democratic will in ballot boxes.
The motion itself calls on Group Leaders to collectively write to the new Prime Minister... specifically calling for the Government to urgently establish a National Commission on Electoral Reform with clear terms of reference, as proposed by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Fair Elections, which should report before the next general election.
Councillor Simpson expressed optimism about the political landscape, stating that this time next Monday, it's almost certain that we will have a pro-PR prime minister walking up the steps of 10 Downing Street.
He further elaborated on the potential for change, noting that Mr Burnham's on record as saying just a few months ago that he wants to see a national commission on electoral reform set up in this parliament and a manifesto commitment to introduce a system of PR into Westminster elections in the next parliament.
An amendment proposed by Councillor Nick Mattey and seconded by Councillor Dave Tchil, which argued that PR is not a cure-all
and raised concerns about campaign tactics, was debated but ultimately lost. Councillor Mattey argued that fear was exploited to achieve their electoral success
by the Liberal Democrats and suggested that under a German-style PR system, Reform UK would be in a very strong position.
Councillor Tchil echoed concerns about the effectiveness of local committees and their financial remuneration, suggesting that funds allocated to local committee chairs could be reinvested into community projects.
The original motion was then carried, signalling Sutton Council's formal backing for electoral reform.