Greenwich Council has unanimously backed a plan to revitalise local shopping parades and town centres across the borough.
The decision, made at a Full Council meeting on Wednesday 21 October 2026, followed a motion that called for a comprehensive review of shopping parades, the development of an improvement strategy, the introduction of a shopfront improvement grant scheme, and a support package for independent businesses.
Councillor Luke Warren, who proposed the motion, highlighted the importance of these local centres for community life and the need for investment beyond major town centres. He stated that many smaller neighbourhood shopping parades are showing signs of decline, with ageing shop fronts, poor public realm, and anti-social behaviour discouraging investment and footfall.
An amendment, proposed by Councillor Stacy Smith and seconded by Councillor George Edgar, was accepted by the original proposer. The amendment emphasised making the proposals deliverable and fairer to the public purse, particularly regarding funding sources and landlord responsibilities.
Councillor Smith, moving the amendment, acknowledged the existing work done by the council but stressed the need for a more focused approach on smaller parades. She noted that while major town centres have received significant investment, smaller parades often lack the same level of attention.
The amended motion calls for:
- A comprehensive review of the condition and economic health of neighbourhood shopping parades.
- The introduction of a Neighbourhood Shopping Parade Improvement Strategy.
- A Shopfront Improvement Grant Scheme, to be funded through available regeneration funds, the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, existing capital investment programmes, and developer contributions.
- A 'Shop Local Support Package' to help independent businesses navigate applications for pavement licences, outdoor seating, and shopfront improvements more quickly.
Councillor Smith also highlighted the importance of private landlords taking responsibility for their properties, stating that any grant funding must be matched by owners and that grants should prioritise independent traders with secure leases.
The motion, as amended, received broad support, with councillors from different parties acknowledging the importance of these local hubs and the need for collaborative action. The council will report back to the Inclusive Economy and Culture Panel within six months on current and planned investment, and the outcomes of funding allocated for shopfront improvements. A further report will also be brought forward on the Plumstead High Street Improvement programme to consider any learnings for other similar schemes.